General Specifications (Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle)
Product Name | Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior |
Type | motorcycle |
Brand | Yamaha |
Year Released | 2006 |
Bore X Stroke | 97 x 113mm |
Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 |
Wet Weight Kg | 298 KG |
Wet Weight Pounds | 658 lbs |
Dry Weight Pounds | 606 lbs |
Dry Weight Kg | 275 KG |
Engine Cc | 1670 CC |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 4 US gal |
Horsepower Hp | 84 HP |
Length Mm | 2385 mm |
Seat Height | 28 in |
Tires Front | 120/70 ZR18 |
Tires Rear | 200/50 ZR17 |
Transmission | 5 Speed |
Wheelbase Inches | 66 in |
Higher than average Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle Specs
Lower than average Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle Specs
Wet Weight Pounds
A motorcycle's wet weight refers to the weight of a motorcycle when fully fueled and equipped with all necessary fluids.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has super wet weight pounds of 658 (lbs), which is 363 (lbs) more than the average wet weight pounds of 295 (lbs). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 78 out of 880 motorcycles for wet weight pounds and we have rated it 15% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Wet Weight Pounds:
Dry Weight Pounds
A motorcycles dry weight refers to the weight of the motorcycle without any fuel, oil, or other fluids.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has an impressive dry weight pounds of 606 (lbs), which is 286 (lbs) more than the average dry weight pounds of 320 (lbs). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 74 out of 880 motorcycles for dry weight pounds and we have rated it 2% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Dry Weight Pounds:
Engine Cc
A motorcycle's engine CC refers to its engine displacement measured in cubic centimeters, determining the power and performance it delivers.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has great Engine CC of 1670 (CC), which is 928 (CC) more than the average Engine CC of 742 (CC). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 77 out of 880 motorcycles for Engine CC and we have rated it 68% out of 100%, which we consider to be poor.
Engine Cc:
Fuel Tank Capacity
Motorcycle fuel tank capacity refers to the amount of fuel, usually measured in liters or gallons, that a motorcycle's fuel tank can hold.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has a low Fuel Tank Capacity of 4 (US gal), which is 4 (US gal) less than the average Fuel Tank Capacity of 8 (US gal). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 276 out of 880 motorcycles for Fuel Tank Capacity and we have rated it 1% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Fuel Tank Capacity:
Horsepower Hp
Horsepower measured in (HP) refers to the level of power generated by a motorcycle.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has still an excellent Horsepower HP of 84 (HP), which is 37 (HP) more than the average Horsepower HP of 47 (HP). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 212 out of 880 motorcycles for Horsepower HP and we have rated it 27% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Horsepower Hp:
Seat Height
Motorcycle seat height refers to the distance between the ground and the highest point of the seat.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has a low Seat Height of 28 (in), which is 4 (in) less than the average Seat Height of 32 (in). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 544 out of 880 motorcycles for Seat Height and we have rated it 1% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Seat Height:
Wheelbase Inches
Motorcycle wheelbase refers to the distance between the center of the front and rear wheels.
The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle has a low Wheelbase inches of 66 (in), which is 23 (in) less than the average Wheelbase inches of 89 (in). The Yamaha XV 1700 Road Star Warrior motorcycle is ranked 76 out of 880 motorcycles for Wheelbase inches and we have rated it 1% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.