The Suzuki Inazuma 250 motorcycle dimensions for 2012-2017 is length 84.4 in (2,145 mm), width 29.9 in (760 mm), height 42.3 in (1,075 mm), wheelbase 56.3 in (1,430 mm), seat height 30.7 in (780 mm), and the ground clearance is 6.5 in (165 mm).
Suzuki Inazuma 250 dimensions at a glance
Dimension charts
Position within similar Suzuki models
Representative dimensions shown within the observed range for comparable Suzuki models in the same category.
Compared with the category median
Percentile and median comparisons use the same comparable Suzuki model group.
Dimension changes by model year
Useful dimension ratios
Seat height feel
About 30.7 in — a very low seat height for its category. This is a geometry comparison, not a guarantee of rider fit.
Wheelbase / length
66.7% of overall length. This shows how much of the bike’s total length is axle-to-axle distance rather than overhang.
Length beyond wheelbase
About 28.1 in (715 mm) combined beyond the axle-to-axle distance.
Bounding-box footprint
About 17.5 sq ft (1.63 m²), calculated from listed overall length × width. Useful for rough storage planning.
Clearance / wheelbase
11.5%. A simple ratio showing listed ground clearance relative to wheelbase.
How its dimensions compare
Compared with other Suzuki models in the same Bikez category where enough usable data is available.
| Dimension | This model | Category median | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall length | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 83.3 in (2,115 mm) | 1.2 in above median |
| Width | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 30.3 in (770 mm) | 0.4 in below median |
| Height | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 42.9 in (1,090 mm) | 0.6 in below median |
| Wheelbase | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 56.9 in (1,445 mm) | 0.6 in below median |
| Seat height | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 30.9 in (785 mm) | 0.2 in below median |
| Ground clearance | 6.5 in (165 mm) | 5.6 in (141 mm) | 0.9 in above median |
Suzuki Inazuma 250 dimensions by year
| Year | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Seat height | Ground clearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
| 2013 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
| 2014 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
| 2015 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
| 2016 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
| 2017 | 84.4 in (2,145 mm) | 29.9 in (760 mm) | 42.3 in (1,075 mm) | 56.3 in (1,430 mm) | 30.7 in (780 mm) | 6.5 in (165 mm) |
Suzuki Inazuma 250 dimensions FAQ
Is the Suzuki Inazuma 250 seat height low or tall?
The representative seat height is 30.7 in (780 mm), which is a very low seat height for its category. 0.2 in below the category median.
Does the Suzuki Inazuma 250 have a short or long wheelbase?
The representative wheelbase is 56.3 in (1,430 mm), giving the Suzuki Inazuma 250 a shorter-than-typical wheelbase. 0.6 in below the category median. The wheelbase is about 66.7% of overall length.
How much ground clearance does the Suzuki Inazuma 250 have?
The representative ground clearance is 6.5 in (165 mm), which is among the highest ground-clearance figures in its category. 0.9 in above the category median.
Is the Suzuki Inazuma 250 compact or large?
The representative overall length is 84.4 in (2,145 mm), making the Suzuki Inazuma 250 among the longest comparable Suzuki models. 1.2 in above the category median. Its rough length × width storage footprint is about 17.5 sq ft (1.63 m²).
What do the Suzuki Inazuma 250 width and height suggest?
Its representative width is 29.9 in (760 mm) and representative height is 42.3 in (1,075 mm). The width is narrower than most comparable Suzuki models. The height is lower than most comparable Suzuki models.
Did the Suzuki Inazuma 250 dimensions change much by year?
Not really based on the supplied comparable figures. The available model-year data does not show a meaningful geometry change.