General Specifications (Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle)
Product Name | Royal Enfield Continental GT |
Type | motorcycle |
Brand | Royal Enfield |
Year Released | 2021 |
Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 |
Wet Weight Kg | 198 KG |
Wet Weight Pounds | 437 lbs |
Engine Cc | 648 CC |
Fuel System | Fuel Injection |
Horsepower Hp | 47 HP |
Ignition | TCI |
Height Mm | 1024 mm |
Length Mm | 2122 mm |
Width Mm | 744 mm |
Tires Front | 100/90-18 |
Tires Rear | 130/70-18 |
Transmission | 6-speed |
Higher than average Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle Specs
Lower than average Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle Specs
Wet Weight Pounds
A motorcycle's wet weight refers to the weight of a motorcycle when fully fueled and equipped with all necessary fluids.
The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle has outstanding wet weight pounds of 437 (lbs), which is 142 (lbs) more than the average wet weight pounds of 295 (lbs). The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle is ranked 303 out of 880 motorcycles for wet weight pounds and we have rated it 10% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Wet Weight Pounds:
Engine Cc
A motorcycle's engine CC refers to its engine displacement measured in cubic centimeters, determining the power and performance it delivers.
The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle has a low Engine CC of 648 (CC), which is 94 (CC) less than the average Engine CC of 742 (CC). The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle is ranked 500 out of 880 motorcycles for Engine CC and we have rated it 26% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Engine Cc:
Horsepower Hp
Horsepower measured in (HP) refers to the level of power generated by a motorcycle.
The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle has a Horsepower HP of 47 (HP), which is 0 (HP) difference than the average Horsepower HP of 47 (HP). The Royal Enfield Continental GT motorcycle is ranked 360 out of 880 motorcycles for Horsepower HP and we have rated it 15% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.