The Kawasaki KX65 motorcycle dimensions for 2007-2023 is length 62.6 in (1,590 mm), width 29.9 in (759 mm), height 37.6 in (955 mm), wheelbase 44.1 in (1,120 mm), seat height 29.9 in (759 mm), and the ground clearance is 12 in (305 mm).
Kawasaki KX65 dimensions at a glance
Dimension charts
Position within similar Kawasaki models
Representative dimensions shown within the observed range for comparable Kawasaki models in the same category.
Compared with the category median
Percentile and median comparisons use the same comparable Kawasaki model group.
Dimension changes by model year
Useful dimension ratios
Seat height feel
About 29.9 in — a very low seat height for its category. This is a geometry comparison, not a guarantee of rider fit.
Wheelbase / length
70.4% of overall length. This shows how much of the bike’s total length is axle-to-axle distance rather than overhang.
Length beyond wheelbase
About 18.5 in (470 mm) combined beyond the axle-to-axle distance.
Bounding-box footprint
About 13 sq ft (1.21 m²), calculated from listed overall length × width. Useful for rough storage planning.
Clearance / wheelbase
27.2%. A simple ratio showing listed ground clearance relative to wheelbase.
How its dimensions compare
Compared with other Kawasaki models in the same Bikez category where enough usable data is available.
| Dimension | This model | Category median | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall length | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 75.6 in (1,920 mm) | 13 in below median |
| Width | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 30.1 in (765 mm) | 0.2 in below median |
| Height | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 45.3 in (1,150 mm) | 7.7 in below median |
| Wheelbase | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 51.6 in (1,310 mm) | 7.5 in below median |
| Seat height | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 34.3 in (871 mm) | 4.4 in below median |
| Ground clearance | 12 in (305 mm) | 13.1 in (332 mm) | 1.1 in below median |
Kawasaki KX65 dimensions by year
| Year | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Seat height | Ground clearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2008 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2009 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2020 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | — | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2021 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2022 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
| 2023 | 62.6 in (1,590 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 37.6 in (955 mm) | 44.1 in (1,120 mm) | 29.9 in (759 mm) | 12 in (305 mm) |
Kawasaki KX65 dimensions FAQ
Is the Kawasaki KX65 seat height low or tall?
The representative seat height is 29.9 in (759 mm), which is a very low seat height for its category. 4.4 in below the category median.
Does the Kawasaki KX65 have a short or long wheelbase?
The representative wheelbase is 44.1 in (1,120 mm), giving the Kawasaki KX65 a very short wheelbase for its category. 7.5 in below the category median. The wheelbase is about 70.4% of overall length.
How much ground clearance does the Kawasaki KX65 have?
The representative ground clearance is 12 in (305 mm), which is very low ground clearance for its category. 1.1 in below the category median.
Is the Kawasaki KX65 compact or large?
The representative overall length is 62.6 in (1,590 mm), making the Kawasaki KX65 very compact for its category. 13 in below the category median. Its rough length × width storage footprint is about 13 sq ft (1.21 m²).
What do the Kawasaki KX65 width and height suggest?
Its representative width is 29.9 in (759 mm) and representative height is 37.6 in (955 mm). The width is narrower than most comparable Kawasaki models. The height is very low overall for its category.
Did the Kawasaki KX65 dimensions change much by year?
Not really based on the supplied comparable figures. The available model-year data does not show a meaningful geometry change.