The Ducati 250 Mark 3D motorcycle dimensions for 1968-1969 is length 78.7 in (2,000 mm), width 23.2 in (590 mm), and the seat height 28.9 in (735 mm).
Ducati 250 Mark 3D dimensions at a glance
Dimension charts
Position within similar Ducati models
Representative dimensions shown within the observed range for comparable Ducati models in the same category.
Compared with the category median
Percentile and median comparisons use the same comparable Ducati model group.
Dimension changes by model year
Useful dimension ratios
Seat height feel
About 28.9 in — a very low seat height for its category. This is a geometry comparison, not a guarantee of rider fit.
Bounding-box footprint
About 12.7 sq ft (1.18 m²), calculated from listed overall length × width. Useful for rough storage planning.
How its dimensions compare
Compared with other Ducati models in the same Bikez category where enough usable data is available.
| Dimension | This model | Category median | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall length | 78.7 in (2,000 mm) | 81.5 in (2,070 mm) | 2.8 in below median |
| Width | 23.2 in (590 mm) | 29.3 in (745 mm) | 6.1 in below median |
| Seat height | 28.9 in (735 mm) | 32.3 in (820 mm) | 3.3 in below median |
Ducati 250 Mark 3D dimensions by year
| Year | Length | Width | Height | Wheelbase | Seat height | Ground clearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 78.7 in (2,000 mm) | 23.2 in (590 mm) | — | — | 28.9 in (735 mm) | — |
| 1969 | — | 23.2 in (590 mm) | — | — | 28.9 in (735 mm) | — |
Ducati 250 Mark 3D dimensions FAQ
Is the Ducati 250 Mark 3D seat height low or tall?
The representative seat height is 28.9 in (735 mm), which is a very low seat height for its category. 3.3 in below the category median.
Is the Ducati 250 Mark 3D compact or large?
The representative overall length is 78.7 in (2,000 mm), making the Ducati 250 Mark 3D very compact for its category. 2.8 in below the category median. Its rough length × width storage footprint is about 12.7 sq ft (1.18 m²).
Did the Ducati 250 Mark 3D dimensions change much by year?
Not really based on the supplied comparable figures. The available model-year data does not show a meaningful geometry change.