General Specifications (Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle)
Product Name | Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR |
Type | motorcycle |
Brand | Aprilia |
Year Released | 2020 |
Bore X Stroke | 81 x 52.3 mm |
Dry Weight Pounds | 408 lbs |
Dry Weight Kg | 185 KG |
Engine Cc | 1077 CC |
Engine Type | 1077cc, Aprilia longitudinal 65° V-4 cylinder |
Fuel System | Airbox with front dynamic air intakes |
Horsepower Hp | 175 HP |
Ignition | Digital electronic ignition |
Length Mm | 2070 mm |
Width Mm | 810 mm |
Tires Front | 120/70 ZR 17 |
Tires Rear | 190/55 ZR 17 |
Transmission | 6-speed cassette type gearbox |
Higher than average Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle Specs
Lower than average Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle Specs
Dry Weight Pounds
A motorcycles dry weight refers to the weight of the motorcycle without any fuel, oil, or other fluids.
The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle has very good dry weight pounds of 408 (lbs), which is 88 (lbs) more than the average dry weight pounds of 320 (lbs). The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle is ranked 235 out of 880 motorcycles for dry weight pounds and we have rated it 1% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Dry Weight Pounds:
Engine Cc
A motorcycle's engine CC refers to its engine displacement measured in cubic centimeters, determining the power and performance it delivers.
The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle has gigantic Engine CC of 1077 (CC), which is 335 (CC) more than the average Engine CC of 742 (CC). The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle is ranked 219 out of 880 motorcycles for Engine CC and we have rated it 44% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.
Engine Cc:
Horsepower Hp
Horsepower measured in (HP) refers to the level of power generated by a motorcycle.
The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle has awesome Horsepower HP of 175 (HP), which is 128 (HP) more than the average Horsepower HP of 47 (HP). The Aprilia Tuono V4 1100 RR motorcycle is ranked 31 out of 880 motorcycles for Horsepower HP and we have rated it 56% out of 100%, which we consider to be much poorer than the top performers.